[Reprint] "Lao" interpreting the five: no socio-political management strategy by daring to inaction and cardiac Tao _ _ Sina Blog

Category: philosophy-morality via the original address: "Lao" interpreting the five: no socio-political management strategy by daring to inaction and applications author: Lao Zhang Jianbai solutions "Lao" reading five free application by daring to doing nothing in the management of social and political strategies: silk book version of the original text: not good, so that the people do not compete. Not your precious cargo, so that the people do not steal. Can't see, so that the people do not. Is the rule of the Saints, their hearts, indeed its abdomen, Annals of weak, strong bone. Constant ignorance so that the people want, intelligence can't, Robert Frost, is not dead. textual in this chapter is not difficult, according to reason is explained very well. But because scholars ' understanding of the 12th chapter there is a problem, not to the 12th chapter of thinking on the principles applied to the understanding of this chapter, chapter does not understand that, in fact, is the first, the second chapter in the continuation of Lao Tzu's unique way of thinking. Experts in the interpretation of this chapter, not only completely opposing ideas, also appeared on some very simple words to understand the issue. This goes to show, interpretation of Laozi's focus, not the text difficulty, but changed the way of thinking. speaking earlier in chapter II, with an emphasis on breaking hearts attachment with the name of the concept, and in this chapter, the principle of thinking proposed names to break and become "speechless", "doing nothing" the platform for action of social management, specific application on the actual state of political and social life. Leave the idea of simple interpretation in chapter III, of course, it is a little confusing and unreadable. Scholars reading this chapter, there have always been two completely opposing ideas: that is reading this chapter is "class attitude"; at this point, either, with these two, can be called "tit". Ren jiyu's position is that LAO is here in the obscurantist, firmly opposed to Lao-Tzu's "obscurantism", he said: "the Lao against Naokata advocates appear at that time, he advocated a legislator. -----If you put an end to these attractive novelty, social stability, people would have been easier to manage. The prevention of negative thinking, reflects the mentality of the agricultural society of small producers of ancient China, even now, still popular ' sight, heart trouble, ' "said. "And go to the countryside movement, such as the cultural revolution, described as Lao Tzu's obscurantist ideology of modern applications. therefore, in the eyes of, Lao is a very immature, and do not understand the social and political naive nerd, the proposal put forth by it's idiotic, like the cultural revolution, like you really want to practice it would have had a big joke. And Lao is like an ostrich, bad handling of problems encountered when you close your eyes, put his head into the sand, "sight, the heart does not get tired". in addition, from academic point of view, the conclusion is a highly "creative", was a revolutionary interpretation of Laozi. Because he says Lao of thought is "reflect agricultural social small producers of mentality"; and history of note home were although in details understands Shang views varies, but are comparison consistent to think: Lao of learn is "emperors of learn", just was belittling of says is "conspiracy", "trickery" of learn, support who says is "Yang conspiracy to" "way", acquisition who also according to themselves of understands with [Lao] to for themselves of behavior provides theoretical basis, most are is about "national"; as Han Fei, people, and later of art home, more including Emperor Wen of, many of Emperor Minister were, history being of Raja were, behind are has Taoist of shadow, source are is [Lao]. There are several Prime Emperor personally write [Laozi] published in the world, as I know had Emperor Xuanzong, Emperor Kang Xi Qing, for the Minister in their own learning. These ancient people if you know the saying [Lao] is actually representative of family farming "producers", I do not know for what?, he used this viewpoint is derived from the interpretation of this chapter before "descriptions", Laozi's post and his own "label" is different. Ren jiyu later in interpretation, was repeatedly emphasized and critique: Lao are stands on the position of the ruler, raised on the rule of the people programme, through its obscurantism and double dealing. Such a "Lao", on behalf of whom? are these rulers is "small producers?" he likes to Lao-labelled, is that all right? even without reading, want to want! our nation's top "old scientist", doctoral students, studies of "national treasure", so "geniuses" speak incoherently, contradictory. Fu Pei-jung views close to ren jiyu, but they feel uncomfortable, so I added some of your own for granted speculation, say a bunch of features such as "in order to avoid the people stuck in, stealing, traps, and obscurantist means, in order to reach the inaction and no treatment". Here apart from the crap does not increase any amount of information. these drums should not, his position is "hold old-style": he took it that the so-called "ignorance" is not the obscurantism, but clearing up specially pseudo-mind. The so-called "free" is not the Elimination of natural instinct, but expansion of digestion and greed. So understood in this way, this chapter is a bit like Lao Tzu's "a manifesto for morality". Chen of this statement, and of some note is imbued with history. By contrast, I think these are more "flavour". But I also think that: neither of them had stood in Lao-Tzu's old stand solutions, no use of Lao Zi's own logic to understand the political ideas of Lao and management tool, so in any event explained, some reluctantly. Even funny. one: "Shang Guixian" lead to "stolen" VS "without words" and "not" run the country well original: no yin, so that the people do not compete. Not your precious cargo, so that the people do not steal. Can't see, so that the people do not. Ren jiyu interpretation does not thrust-weight people with talent, lest the people competition. Do not attach importance to rare items, so that people do not steal. No touch is sufficient to give rise to desire something, so that people's minds will not be disturbed. Interpretation of these drums should be: do not flaunt wise, so that people can't afford to race. Corruption does not show things that people do not delude. Explanation of Fu Pei-jung: not honoured outstanding talent, people would not compete competition; don't value the rare commodity, people would not become thieves; don't show something, people would not have been disturbed. textual here is relatively simple, but the expertsObservations were not uniform. On the word exegesis, I still have a little problem. Mainly on the "people" understanding in there, "the people" are "the people", from the perspective of thinking, the principles of this chapter is "on", "" under, ruler of the governed "management tools". To define the Laozi, no wonder you want to say that LAO is "people South of the great art of the" learn version of Lao Zi's rulers, have to be a big obscurantism and double dealing is not available if good things can't let people see, can't let people know. Hiding only their own, secretly enjoy; also to news blockade cannot let people know that wonderful in the outside world, nor that people learn a variety of knowledge, to keep their minds the more simple the better. To find out the secret police, let people know not to blab. Material just let people enjoy the most basic life, it is best to rationing, or commodity-rich people "hearts a mess", and bad management. �������������ӵ��������뷽�ԣ����Ƿ��ֽ��յı����ʣ��������ӵġ��������֪���ڵ��й��ˣ��м����뵽������ȥ�����֡���������������������ĸ�ʱ�ڵ���һ�ס���ɽ���硱�������������ӵ���һ����ϵ��������Ϊ��������ǧ��֮��ġ��Ŷ�������Ϊ�ߺޡ� Ҳ�������ݵġ� ���ǹ��ëʱ����������ι����ȷҲ������ġ� ��������������Ҳ����˵����һ����������뷨�� Or by the "old rules" to find logical contradictions; result is contradictory! obscurantism to be implemented during the cultural revolution, North Korea, as well as today's "people's Democratic Republic," politics and needs is power politics, single-polarization values, as well as the draconian law, forced to suppress the people thought and behavior (it is said that even the people of North Korea's "domestic tourism" will be opening soon, so small a State management enough to "strict" and "fine"). China during the cultural revolution, critical examination does not say, even the life of common people, what things do I need per year, all invoices for permit strict "control". The whole country, is "planned" well. Where is "doing nothing", it was too "promising". Also, "published two" always published an editorial, Little Red Book "everyday stress", the following people meet every day, write criticism, writing reports, to all the people "seeking unity", and even buy vegetables are back "quotations". This is where is "without words" and "statements". this "promising" political history, the most representative was the Qin dynasty, cheat, suppresses; draconian law, people suffer. Leader during the cultural revolution Mao someone appreciate the Qin Shi Huang, RUO's "historian" hurry up and write the verdict on paper, for the sing the praises of Qin Shi Huang, top up. Research scholars point out that the history of the cultural revolution: the cultural revolution, burned books, died of intellectuals, the destruction of the Chinese civilization, more powerful than the Qin Huang, and indeed had reached "unprecedented" strategic objectives, which can be [Lao] is not the same as the ideal community. "Ash pit is not cold, Shandong province, Liu didn't read"; to let people "no knowledge" does not stabilize their rule. Lao is obviously very much against them. Requirements of "doing nothing", and how can also engage in "power politics", or specifically to do with demanding "legislator" and "promising". Examples are: the overthrow of the strong early after the Qin and Han dynasty emperor Wen Jing two, is the real implementation of "Lao" political management, exactly the opposite of Qin dynasty and their political management. The Government is "doing nothing", so that countries themselves to recuperate, and soon began to be mighty. in countries such as North Korea, the Government is very "strong", various rules and regulations, advocacy tools is strictly controlled and accomplished, you also need to process a lot of "false information" cheating deceive people, let people live in the illusion of "happiness". Obscurantism doing quite well. There are many "face of engineering" to get out to fool and foreign visitors, and so on. This is contrary to the Lao requires rulers "without words" programme, the Government is too "would say" people "without words". just like when I was a kid, we lived very difficult and often soaked pickled vegetables, eat cereal crops as a meal, but we also want to chain of tears: Taiwan people living in "dire straits", we need to go to rescue from the tabloids "must liberate Taiwan" ambition. I this inferences: now of North Korean people, maybe also with we year as, wants to to rescue South Korea (Korea) of poor compatriots 's? so: so of Government, is too "outstanding" has, too "promising" has, instead, Western national of government institutions, on people of effect, is to "incompetence" was more! so, since here produces has so obvious of logic contradictions, only judgment two species may: first, any Mr of explains is wrong of, not logic; second species may: Lao thinking confusion, political thought childish, is a pedantic view, not seriously treat. like which answer? their own choice. I would like to support Lao, because this is the solution proposed by Lao in advance when I "axiom", Lao Zi, must acknowledge that Lao Tzu's more wise than we, don't make this stupid mistake; the Lao is not insane, he must have its own set of logic. here, go back to the Gu Yi study on "people", you know that ancient "people", is not rejected by the ruling of the lower deck of "ordinary people", but "human" and "owners collectively, the" mean. So to understand, Laozi said here, not top to bottom with a kind of "racked their brains strategy" is not a means of dealing with people, but for the whole population will apply the values and principles of conduct. Two sets of standards therefore not hypocritical, used against the people, and your own enjoyment. (To fool the people, he could not stupid). Lao-thing, easily misunderstood causes, is the meaning of his words are too rich, and ran a little, just like the elephant, how can guys? in this chapter, if we can read the link to the previous chapter, it is also very simple: not calling for "doing nothing" and "obvious"? thinking principles in chapter II, finishCan be used in chapter III, Laozi's logic is consistent. second: no yin, so that the people do not compete. Heavenly Tao Wu Wei, preserving a variety of possible trends. As a ruler, I want to know all the possibilities, and reserve the right to final decision making, rather than only in one direction and after the act rashly, that is, "without words" and "doing nothing" management requirements. "Yin on" is selected only the orientation when people respected learning a "Sage talents" when social trends and values formation a fixed unit of direction. Laozi, a single value is terrible, can lead to disastrous results. This is not the last chapter talks about "the world is known to us, bad for the United States", at the time of application for social management changed his way of saying it? why can't I "Yin on"? "on the yin" means all of the other "no yin" hit are the majority, but in the infinite possibilities in social, only emphasize a specific value. In order to "sages", naturally we had to go all out "competing for" the only way out of this article, the results, we will have a lot of problems. first of all, the value of a single, in violation of the fairness of the equal treatment of other possibilities. Lao Tzu's view, "yin" and "unlikely" is standing at an angle of view, the universal applicability of the absolute truth does not exist if rulers "on yin", only one aspect of a particular angle, will guayilouwan will lead to imbalances in the community, are necessarily unstable situation may cause great damage to systems. this is also the Mencius to the recommendations of the Liang huiwang, not "profit", if the "benefit" as the national standards, materials and money became a unique national values, promotes learning, "wealth hero" values is the lurk a terrible crisis-----"country risk". Mencius does not oppose "profits", just to balance, would like to add additional values, virtue, and so on. this was followed by: "Yin on" results, in accordance with Lao-dependent phase of yin and Yang and Taoist thought, at the same time there will be a peer "no yin." Promotion of "yin" more, "no good" would be more, but lead to social disorder and hypocrisy of the hearts of impetuous. It is impossible to escape causality, so why go to the trouble then? diandaoweizhi when you want, that it was received. Think of the Ming and Qing dynasties "fierce PRIVET woman" results in an attempt to improve people's "moral standards", results lead to the human tragedy is indeed startling. Such as the famous "upright officials" Hai Rui, simply because they do not meet Valet at the ten-year old daughter and gave her a piece of bread to eat, contrary to the "men and women of Defense" of chastity, the result is this "it is courageous to maintain one's virtue or integrity," "good father" starvation locked up alive in order to help young daughter of "righteousness". I do not know when children die, this guy was sad is? more than other, more astonished, we are interested in your own time and look around; at that time in order to get the Tongzhi "chastity" and commended, by hook or by crook "die", not only improve people's "moral standards", it is greatly stimulated the malevolent and cruel fake side of mass psychology. Later the Qing Government finds significant shortcomings, is announcing the end of the "recognition of chastity", not "elected". In this case, can be regarded as Lao Tzu's "restless yin" of a foresight and wisdom. The whole country, demanding, be a tax on consumption, the result back towards a goal. We can see that the "Naokata" advocates experienced LAO's opposition is normal, because contrary to the "not by daring to doing nothing" management principles, the results will certainly not good. Lao-Tzu's "negative doing nothing" thinking different, our nation has always been proactive "Naokata"; during the cultural revolution, we all worship "war heroes", because the State leader's judgment is "World War III may occur at any time", so public opinion, textbooks, and we are "ready"; in elementary school when children play mostly military games, I also listen to the teacher and classmates arrangement, dug bomb shelters. Our luojiashan Wuhan University, is empty, it is a large scale "civil engineering". Of course, "and" outcome of the war hero, is China's national economy near collapse; the former Soviet Union also own "and" the cold war, resulting in disintegration. [Lao] warn of more than 2000 years ago, you had to, single values from harm, should be quite obvious. Thanks to Deng Xiaoping emerged in China, set "economic development as the Central" policy, China's economic development today "thriving". However, Lao Zi said: do nothing overdone. three: the national education sector's "on" yin "and its devastating consequences we now the object of worship is" hero of wealth ". What are the results, we all look, he wanted to and I do not say any more. Mencius said: "dangerous", isn't it? ladies and gentlemen your own judgment. educators also have their own "Heroes" is a "champion for college entrance examination". The students also have their own "yin"---Tsinghua University, Peking University, all citizens are consistently "Yin on", the University or the national mobilization, parents have to pull up banners on the road prior to the examination room, it is necessary to pass vehicle diversions to avoid "disturb" kids examinations. All sorts of strange things will happen every year around the college entrance examination, including death. Annually 200,000 suicides of school students, college entrance examination the baton "credit" should not be overlooked. But everybody "understands" and active participation in the college entrance examination; this is China education "wonders of the world". We are a poor relation, out of a "champion", resulting in various government departments, the media, enterprises, the boss to come all at once, such as reports, recommend, send money, and in very good shape, and easily fixed tuition issue; in education, our Board, education, the teachers, school principals involved in each of the students, their families, are very "promising". Bureau of education officials are busy "development outline", "serious examination", the principal teachers have been engaged in "hard" teaching kids Baba to abandon all temptation to "learn"; parents not only actively participate in the "compulsory" all activities, also produced large amounts of money at their own expense, engage in "excellent", and developed into a huge market for training. Parents at home "to accompany Prince Edward read" let the children work hard late into the night. Reason, we at the nationalXia, the Government and the public with concentric, emphasis on education (education), education should be made well? unfortunately, is better than a year and a half years!, including professors at the University of Tsinghua University and Beijing University, came to the unanimous conclusion: students ' learning abilities now, worse than one of the first and final exam requirements year over year decline. Taiwan Tsinghua University Professor taught, only to find that the "Tsinghua students as examinations of the idiots", there is no ability to think, a big surprise, urged the students wake up! a sober Tsinghua students Wang Yuen, still a year you can get a PhD, they decided to drop out, with your own action represents a strong protest to China's education system. on one hand, domestic enterprises in called "no one", a lot of responsible business, their education, training, and training. At the same time, a large number of students can't find work, is really a great spectacle. 1 million unemployed graduates this year, next year this year as the economic situation (even worse), there are no jobs with at least 2 million will be (note, this article written in 2008, then actual situation in 2009 was nearly 4 million students unemployed, serious than I expected); see this situation, you do not need too much of "Superman", you can easily conclude that China's "education", is ready to play up! a few years later, there will be major changes: since no change out of the question. Chinese people have to hit a brick wall. education is not "Naokata", not "standard", there is no "examples", right? Lao-Tzu's old "doing nothing", can be used for education? the answer is Yes! currently in education "rule by doing nothing," the typical, lacking qinding uniform "national curriculum" countries, there is no "unified teaching material" or "unified curriculum of" standards, does not engage in "test", nor "unified admission", nor "national educational ideals and Declaration" country is the United States. How can the domestic education officials, teachers, students, and parents: the left above the "unification", will "mask", don't know what to ask: How did this get? couldn't teach without law? there is no standard for how to do it? "chaos!" does not only more alive, and there is no doubt that United States is currently the education is the best country in the world. United States succeed, essentially educational success. There are some domestic "education experts" for their feathers to announce the "paper" and various statements, said China's basic education than the United States, and United States has the advantage of higher education. This is all nonsense, which means that other people make Olympic champion when they grow up, we really want to say is when they grow up, please have a good coach training, as a child of "basic" is not zayang, it is better to us even qualifying pass people. You can also "powerful instructions": the primary school opening games n years ago, the championship did not outperform the US baby, baby every day because my home coach to "superior", "basic education" better, now lost, selected coach is my baby grow up well. In fact the root cause, others do not play such a spoil things through excessive enthusiasm of the "suicide" training method. This is like a "silly people eat cake" logic, only eat the last piece of the pie are well fed, cakes come in front of, and does not pay. But a funny logic, still believe and preach, can only show that we really enjoy ourselves. United States also have "MOE", but the Ministry of education, there is no "right", not a school "to" him. He is only responsible for a number of "guiding" plans and proposals, the following schools and principals could not hear nothing. School specific teaching arrangements, curriculum, and so on, all decided by the principal. Principals need to curry favor with the community, to make a good teacher to teach, or parents and students will make representations. Teachers must obtain a student identification, otherwise there would be no appointment the following year. Bad school, loss of students, you have to shut down. Entire process does not require the Government's "education officials" participation, all "market adjustment", this is the "rule by doing nothing" in education. Such an environment, of course, will cause great differences among individuals, is also a Government-run public schools, funding and quality vary greatly, even private schools. So we need from the United States to look for some cases of failed education, it is too easy. Why not learn it? they're not coming in a large number of world class elite schools do? United States elite, elite concept was completely different to us. For example, the top schools of the University are basically private universities, public schools can squash the "accident". University of University policy and teaching ideas, principles, principals and managers were very concerned about, and teachers are best, however, is whether the Government, that is why the Government inaction. Of course, you can't give money, what what? actually giving money, regardless of the Government, or tube. Chiang Kai-shek of the Southwest, regardless of who is funding (may have no energy tubes), learn what United States Germany, who was song meiling was by first lady of United States private prestigious university graduation? although not learning home, really hate also secretly to kill several, Southwest in just a few years of school history, several Nobel Prize winners, there was "two bombs" experts such as talent. This goes to show: rely on funding from the Government-run University, but has to do (and promising), is unable to make prestigious, more bureaucratic than educators understand the possibilities of education does not exist. in addition, the United States University, are of great personalities; almost every University, has its own "learned" and the advantages of professional, in one respect is the "first", otherwise unable to attract students. They do not have a uniform "standard" to judge. Such as schools, we thought that Harvard's best, actually no, Wharton MBA graduates value is much higher than that of Harvard, which is a market to speak of. Even some State universities, you can have a Nobel Prize winner in batches. Unlike universities in our country, there is no essential difference between elite (Ministry of education, "leadership" and "arrange", the leaders "in every possible way" under the care, the teachers and students "cooperate", the Chinese schools will not, nor principled differenceOr "illegal"). Differences between universities open courses may not be, for example, while all this science almost around one-third hours per week "public politics" is a unified national college students on the "compulsory". Even is boss took themselves of money to investment, student took themselves of money to reading of private University, regardless of principals, teacher, student is willing to open and Shang this class, are must unconditional to obedience "Education unified management", is is funny! is equal to the I at home cooking eat, must obedience "cooking Committee" developed of "diet outline", must with "Committee" investment of "Community Center" practices full as, also was accept "canteen staff" of regularly check, must do and eat some turnoff and toxic of "standard meal", otherwise on violation has "diet standard", will is sentenced to for "illegal cooking", will cancel "cooking dinner qualification"; tube was is too wide has! so, so strictly regulatory Xia of education system, natural to tube died has. Even setting up a little more private universities, no matter how much investment, by nature, is not what is the difference between not possible at Harvard, Stanford "elite". Fail to come out even Southwest; just the Ministry of education is "promising". China had a dozen years ago the fire over a period of private schools "noble" fail one after another, that's why. Because China fundamental on no real significance Shang of, has unique and independent of education concept of "private schools", with themselves of money, playing national provides of game, on does not letter you playing was has "national" school, does not pour only strange; see trends, again has years is now these currently are red of private University have collapse of when has, because they of graduates, is enterprise awarded "even middle school students are than", so refused hired; parents were also will silly to advance wave upon wave of flower large money sent children in did? to Shi estimated only will has minority name for "University", actually is training technology workers of "practical type University" of "private" University, also has opportunities survival down. (In fact, the name private universities does not, it should be "private capital public universities") in the "unified" under the standard, a common "Naokata" which Chinese universities lack essential difference. Difference between so-called elite schools, mainly funding differences, differences in building, historical differences, differences of students, rather than a difference spirit and methods of education. If Tsinghua students all come by Wuhan University, Wuhan University of course become the "first in the country", sent to Lake campus students of Tsinghua University, Tsinghua University soon reduced to "inflow of third-rate College", with principals and teachers ideas and levels of education does not matter. In our education system in the extreme "promising" thinking mode, no matter how good the principals, teachers, and plays no role. Tsinghua University, "international standard" salary, Taiwan, Hong Kong professors to teach, but I guess not. From the United States back of Chen danqing Professor at Tsinghua University lecturer, obviously not fit: he simply "didn't know how to teach at Tsinghua", because he has to comply with various strange, violation of fundamental knowledge about teaching "educational requirements and standards," and refused to "mixed", the result had to take the initiative to resign. "Aid to China Professor" did not resign, but is not necessarily "adapt", of course, bonus pay, hard, it is easy to adapt to, I guess we just to adapt to the "salary standards" to stay. United States education boom is Lao Tze "doing nothing" educational success, and doing nothing, not to praise a "standard" (not yet) result, forming United States individualization of education, every school are hardy and survive with great vitality, just as the original ecological forest, full of life. Some of which grow well, being recognized for high, became famous. Not one, but a group. Even if so, United States people are not satisfied, too school education does not meet their demands, they need more "personalized"; results in the United States has existed for more than 1 million are "homeschooling" parents teach their children on their own. These schools do not have uniform standards, "education" and "course" solely by their "principals" that is, parents ' sole discretion. However, they are widely recognized by the Government and the public. Moreover, survey results indicate that on both academic assessment and the physical and mental health, as well as the University's "percentage", and "home school" of students is significantly better than the regular school. personally, I doubt very much: the United States these large amounts of the family school, is the United States signals a major rejuvenation of basic education, Japan and Europe's basic education than the United States is strong, but United States homeschooling movement, may create a more powerful United States, after many years would produce a similar to Harvard, Yale this prestigious, good basic education schools. This government doesn't spend a penny, not put up a building, but also saved a lot of this should be set aside "compulsory" requirements, full of "doing nothing", the result has created even more effective than invest heavily "education miracle", how can we not learn this wisdom? Lao-Tzu's "rule by doing nothing," "will not be teaching is" really simple, and effective. However, being a foreigner to learn. Industrious and courageous Chinese people, have nothing to fear leisurely panic, of course, "promising" IV: not your precious cargo, so that the people do not steal. in ancient China there is a saying: when the rare antiques, prices suddenly skyrocket, become very valuable and sought after a lot of people, when hot, is the end of the last boom in troubled times is coming quickly. Qingping, this stuff is worthless. Source of this, in fact, Lao-Tzu's "not expensive rare." Once these things "expensive" it, people are stealing is, of course, in troubled times to start. In troubled times, evil will always be people. To it, this is Lao farsighted, the people's livelihood, where the "legislator" ruler of a State of mind? this statement do not know how many of the antique reliability, but the Ming and Qing dynasties of China, and indeed should this sentence. The two dynasties, is in the "material" developed to the highest peak when a sudden collapse. Lao does not believe that the world what a real "baby", the so-called "treasure" is simply "amazed at rare" in that sense. Also from the people "liked and respected" in terms ofLook, another way, where is the "baby", might be a spam, it may also be "big poisonous weeds." these things really, 49 after the revolution, some of the rich and powerful family, some of the original collection at great prices "of rare treasures", did not expect at all after the liberation, "worthless", in order to live and had to transfer very cheaply, for low cost of living. The cultural revolution, and these things are a dime a dozen, far from being worthless, harmful! ignition burn for distribution only to watch. My grandfather study stay in the same year a large number of books written in ancient times and old paintings in the Qing dynasty, during the cultural revolution was his eldest son were all handed over to "the revolutionary masses" the flames. Only my father remained a part of the Qing dynasty 20 volume [complete Han Changli], and [guwen guanzhi], high school, I was playing, dip a little prose of "aura". Of course, all of which have been "worth", and "dirt" thing, if you can stay up to now, everything is "baby". Laozi was: there is no real "treasure", only bad things get, you have to think of it as the treasure will only bring to their evil, but not us. In this connection, Emperor Wen of history, is the true home. People send him a "rare goods" took, he publicly edict said: this stuff astonished, but he does not need at all, so there is no real value (this is not your precious cargo), to bring people to take back the horse of the horse, in addition to his journey back and forth. In particular: "I shall not offer, do not make the Quartet to offer", there is no so-called "precedent" sort of hypocritical, or would like to contribute to other people, "rare treasures" zeal to pander to completely dismiss; some of our corrupt officials, he was not "wise" subordinates, bribery of "wealth" to off. Own a piece of clothing the Emperor, wearing a lot of years (20 years) has also continued to wear, where as it is a small County magistrate, pomp "luxury" people "feel envious at the sight of sth.". Han dynasty, to achieve the "thrilling governance", and the people very happy, Emperor happy in history as one of the great "prosperity". Emperor Wen is also not very "promising" ground political, it is estimated that day than Kim Il-Sung was much more comfortable to live, far more people to be happy. So, to select [Laozi] good example should be selected in the early Han dynasty, the Emperor, and not pick the "cultural revolution", and certainly not North Korea. Friday: no, so that the people do not. in this sentence, silk book version less than passing a "heart" Word, I think it is right. "See" before, people are not just "confused" issue, various behaviors, is chaos, unable to clean up. There are just "confused" as simple as that. Text explanations here, is essentially a "see" things, he interpreted as "no touch", or "not seen" direct means of escape, his literal translation: "no touch is sufficient to give rise to desire something, people's minds do not disturb". Such rulers would have been good to deal with them. If you are a flock of sheep, "training" is silly, see wolves do not know the ran, caught and eaten easily. Wolves want this, sheep are willing to do? I think it's a bit of wishful thinking, like Plugging Ones Ea, like a news blockade, Obscurantism; some parents bring their kids go shopping, particularly to avoid the toy Department. Isn't a clever note. later, he also emphasized that: I want to have people without knowledge, without desire. Are some cruel, when the opponent to look up people, quite a bit like Kim Il Sung's gaocan. Lao is definitely Super Schemer, but did it really is Laozi? I believe that LAO will not be so secretive work, doing hypocrisy aside, difficulty of implementation is also very high, very trouble to bother, unlike the Lao-thrust-weight "is not" the lazy way. At the same time if you like any of this understanding, this parallelism with other few discrepancies, logically inconsistent. interpretation, I agree some of Chen: "see" interpreted as a "show", highlight the meaning. "See," here is actually a "now" homophones, and familiar with the "low wind blown grass Xian cattle and sheep" is an implication: wind blowing down tall grass, cattle and sheep are "highlighted" came out. This meaning, he could not have been unaware? middle school level. So I have to criticize his "research" not stringent enough, instead of "academic level is not enough". in this way, we find: "()" and "your" and "on (yet)", have the same "extra value and highlight the" has the meaning, is a deliberate "promising", therefore contrary to the Lao-Tzu's "doing nothing" proposition; at the same time they are generated by a subjective desire and the will of the people's cognitive concepts is not a real "natural and divine order of things" itself, contrary to the "truth" did not meet the "Taoist natural spirit of"; why is Laozi against it. this means that when reading Laozi, look at his inner meanings, contact contextual understanding, rather than only for a single word in isolation to explain, it must go the wrong way. Do not also stressed that "universality and particularity of using connection" of the "dialectic" to do academic research? interpretation when you forget it. there is another difficulty is the "may". Experts have found to be generally bad. He said to be "enough" has the meaning, which explains the lack of technical content: how to determine the degree to which the temptation of "sufficient to give rise to desire?" with extra "value", and "man-made", certainly in contrast to Lao Zi's thought. The original Fu apply indiscriminately, not explained. Chen said "many" means, but they did not come out on the dictionary. So he'll have to quote the Exegetical high tedious research that proves it, wanted to say good words for Lao: Lao Zi is not against the desire, only opposes desire too much. But what is it? what is less? if defined? this is a big problem. This group of scholars is truly ask for trouble, directly with the original meaning of "licenses, endorses, certainly encouraged", is very fitting sentence meaning, not to have people do not understand, do look they have learned? the ancients said: not broken. This is a word of the truth: not to be done as he did "notTouch ", only hypocrisy of pathologists and revolutionaries, will" nature existent destroy men desire ". Passion, human beings are born with, broken, how can a "no touch"? can not only stress that no "show off", though. Lao will just say "less private Unselfish", there is no VIP broken, nor does it require "destroy", it would be disingenuous, and obviously can't do that. "Desire" just keep on the legitimate needs, but do not owe, followed the divine order, is natural, that is, doing nothing. just as eating "appetite", if you want to like "no touch" do? "the way" is defined as it is a basic survival needs, take as long as the nutrition, eat would be able to absorb, is the "food". Extra additional things just do not care. When someone sincerely invites you to a $ 100,000 worth of meals, there is no need to "firmly resist", "fight to defend" their own "war against the innocent" and "no touch". Lao Zi said, you can eat, but eat mentality to flat, and you usually eat a meal of five dollars, "working lunch", which essentially is no different. Do not show to show off, or unworthy show. so, after eating would take over the show off: I had a $ 100,000 worth of dinner meals, luxury so much, how delicious the rare. So that other people haven't eaten after listening to great, great excitement, do a restless look. Even if someone knows you after eating the meal, curious to ask you "how", but also simple to tell them: Yeah, like eating fast food almost. Of course, it is also possible the bosses know you "feel", has no taste, may not go and eat, please; don't regret, "on the border is not" don't eat at ease. just like my old risk, a big boss asked me to eat near the old foreign settlement in Guangzhou "upscale" Yan abalone and shark's fin, and came back around people ask me how, I said nothing, just like eating fans. Not hypocritical, really think about it. This is the "missing"----no "show off" could stimulate others to "admire and envy", so that my "feel good and important," "desire" approach, wouldn't cause movable, culminating "civil unrest". Otherwise, everyone needs to a $ 100,000 worth of dinner, not chaos, not "revolution" is not available. unfortunately, what people don't understand the Laozi this truth; today's society, everywhere in the "show off", not "desire", they have to pick yourself up. Small, try to give you picked as "desire", a desire simply to get you to die, such as sing themselves hoarse "Let me love once enough", I see only died are "enough". So the men and women to live in the community, why not "anxiety"-How does not "chaos" (mess, people, social unrest). Now online, the latest trends in "Sun", in fact, Laozi "(explicit)" mean: what's pride or pride in anything, "Sun Sun", salary, bonus, car, jewelry, and so on, viciously that also people who do not own "chaos"----in fact he has "a mess". Laozi in the post article also says: "the disaster of great to desire", translation is "nothing (deliberately) to encourage and stimulate the (own) desire greater disaster." These things really! if you desire to be recognised and encouraged, then, is the endless pursuit of the process, the so-called discontented; we are tired and bitter, want to die would like to live, are basically positive results and supported his desire to follow. Many of those who commit murder and suicide are the heart, asking not resulting in uncontrollable situations. So, is also true for countries, so Lao Zi said: "the disaster of great to desire", asking people to "see", were so visionary. In today's world, "desire" do best, most dedicated effort, that is, a variety of advertising and commercial promotion. So-called commercial society, is in the "smart people" shout "desire" struggling to move on. Nationals were colorful ads blow without any confidence, distract, constantly hard earn money to fill the desires, "buy peace of mind and happiness", and his face is full of anxiety. "Strong Chinese" promise behind a glass of milk is not known how much HIV children. Lao-if you see this situation, if he gave a long sign: Oh, man, why should we ask for trouble? business and customer relationships, not the relationship between product and consumer, is a liar and idiot is the relationship between